Search results
1 – 6 of 6Lourens Erasmus and Philna Coetzee
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in perception of the key stakeholders on the drivers of internal audit effectiveness, namely, senior management and the…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in perception of the key stakeholders on the drivers of internal audit effectiveness, namely, senior management and the audit committee, in relation to identified measures. To be seen as an effective internal audit function, value needs to be added for both these stakeholders. It is thus important for internal auditing to obtain an understanding of what these stakeholders respectively perceive as the most prominent drivers of internal audit effectiveness.
Design/methodology/approach
Heads of internal audit functions (providing insight into the drivers), chairpersons of audit committees and senior management (providing insight into the measures) within the South African public sector responded to a survey. The data were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis to reduce the set of items and to provide continuous scores for use in a multivariate multiple regression analyses.
Findings
Senior management and the audit committee differ in their level or order of prominence of the identified drivers that influence the identified measures of internal audit effectiveness. No statistical similarities in their level of views could be found.
Originality/value
To enhance the effectiveness of internal auditing, the internal audit functions should take cognisance of the difference in perceptions of its key stakeholders on the drivers of internal audit effectiveness, in relation to identified measures, to manage these relationships. No previous research could find that statistically compared views of senior management and the audit committee regarding the drivers of internal audit effectiveness.
Details
Keywords
Juan-Pierré Bruwer, Philna Coetzee and Jacolize Meiring
The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical relationships that exist between two of the elements of a sound internal control system, namely internal control activities…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical relationships that exist between two of the elements of a sound internal control system, namely internal control activities and managerial conduct, and the perceived sustainability of South African small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs).
Design/methodology/approach
Data were obtained from management and employees of 100 South African SMMEs operating in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods industry. All participants were interviewed by means of face-to-face structured interviews due to the complexity of the questions posed.
Findings
Only general management competencies have a relationship with the economic sustainability of these business entities. The rejection of three of the four hypotheses supports the current poor sustainability rate with approximately 75 per cent of South African SMMEs having to close their doors after being in operation for only three years.
Originality/value
As this study is the first of its kind for SMMEs, and although limited relationships were identified, it is crucial for management of SMMEs as well as government bodies that have an influence sphere over these entities, to ensure that SMME management incorporate crucial internal control activities and appropriate management conduct in their businesses.
Details
Keywords
There is a widening gap between the expectations of internal audit stakeholders and the value the function brings to the table, for example, in the management of the risks…
Abstract
Purpose
There is a widening gap between the expectations of internal audit stakeholders and the value the function brings to the table, for example, in the management of the risks threatening an organisation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the views of chief audit executives (CAEs), the chairs of audit committees and senior management on the contribution of the internal audit functions to risk management in the South African public sector. This contribution is considered in the context of existing risk management structures and the level of coordination between these structures and internal auditing.
Design/methodology/approach
The views of heads of internal auditing, chairpersons of the audit committee and the Accounting Officer (similar to the CEO of private sector organisations) of national, provincial and local government organisations were obtained and statistically analysed.
Findings
The results indicate that the CAEs have noticeably different views from the other two parties, and that the existence of risk management structures has a minor effect on how the contribution of internal auditing to risk management is perceived.
Research limitations/implications
It was decided to not include the views of heads of risk management functions owing to the immaturity of risk management in this sector with in the South African public sector.
Practical implications
The results of the study provide internal auditing with information on narrowing the possible gap between the perceptions of senior management and their own perceptions. Senior management could streamline the efforts of these two parties in mitigating the key risk of the organisation. The audit committee, as the independent overseer of internal auditing, will obtain information on whether internal auditing contributes to risk management, and if not, how to address these issues, taking into account the existence (or a lack thereof) of risk management structures. The legislator and regulator of public sector could be influenced to provide clearer guidance or rules in this regard in order to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of risk management policies and practices.
Originality/value
Limited studies have been conducted regarding the coordination of internal auditing and risk management in mitigating the key risks; especially within the public sector domain whether the existence of risk management structures would affect this coordination. Also the views of senior management, as the key stakeholder of internal auditing, on this matter have not yet been solicited.
Details
Keywords
Philna Coetzee, Houdini Fourie and Pricilla A Burnaby
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the internal audit quality was maintained in relation to the rapid growth in Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) membership in…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the internal audit quality was maintained in relation to the rapid growth in Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) membership in South Africa. As The IIA in South Africa (SA) has seen more than double the membership growth (59 per cent) than the IIA (25 per cent) over the period 2006 to 2010, the change in internal audit quality indicators for these two are compared.
Design/methodology/approach
The responses from SA respondents and all “Other” respondents are analysed from the 2006 and 2010 Common Body of Knowledge studies on specific questions addressing internal audit quality, to determine whether there is a growth in quality-related indicators and whether the growth is in relation to the membership growth. The chi-square test is used to look for change in response frequencies.
Findings
The paper finds that the SA respondents have a greater increase of internal audit quality indicators than “Other” respondents, suggesting that the increase in membership could also result in improved internal audit quality.
Originality/value
This study links the increase in membership with improved internal audit quality. This could assist the IIA in determining the feasibility of developing key indicators of internal audit quality. The IIA-SA will obtain an understanding whether the exceptional growth in membership is in line with the internal audit excellence as prescribed by SA guidance and legislation. Last, individual internal audit activities could benchmark their growth statistics against the SA and “Other” respondents’ growth pattern – both in numbers and quality indicators.
Details
Keywords
This paper aims to examine whether the African commercial banks selected as the best African banks by Global Finance Magazine really are the best.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to examine whether the African commercial banks selected as the best African banks by Global Finance Magazine really are the best.
Design/methodology/approach
Panel data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used, as well as the Malmquist total factor productivity index, to distinguish productive banks from unproductive banks. Nineteen commercial banks were selected from the 30 best African banks as identified by the Global Finance Magazine.
Findings
Of the 19 banks, five were found to be unproductive. Bank productivity was attributed mainly to technological change, and different methods marked different results, for example, the regional winner bank (Standard Bank of South Africa) selected by Global Finance Magazine ranked ninth in this study, whereas the Bank Windhoek Limited, Namibia, ranked first.
Practical implications
The study confirms the applicability of DEA for the banking industry. The model shows variability among the banks’ efficiency and productivity and provides different results to the Global Finance Magazine’s best bank selection. For example, the Standard Bank of South Africa, which is selected as the regional winner, is now ranked ninth under the DEA Malmquist’s total factor productivity.
Originality/value
The study shows that the DEA model can be applied not only for analysing the firm’s efficiency but also for objective rating, ranking and selecting best banks.
Details